Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Without question, one of the most important–and rewarding–things we do in marketing is work with the awe-inspiring and passionate Mozilla community. Specifically, we help plan, manage, coordinate and sponsor events all over the globe. As the number of events has grown, we’re looking to grow our community marketing team with the addition of a superstar community manager to focus first on events, and second on driving broader community marketing programs.

If you or someone you know would love to join the Mozilla Community marketing team, please see the job description posted on mozilla.com, send us a resume and let us hear about why you’d be a great addition to the team.

In addition to the full-time position that just posted, we’re also looking for a few stellar undergrads to join us for a summer of fun and teamwork in Mountain View, CA. Our creative director, John Slater, recently blogged about one Community Marketing internship to focus on SpreadFirefox and the new Mozilla Creative Collective project — a full job description is now posted.

And our resident man-about-campus, Jay Patel, also has another internship opportunity to help build and drive our Campus Reps program. That job description is also posted here.

All of these positions, the full-time Community Marketing Manager role and the two internships, offer a great opportunity to put your experience and passion for Firefox to work. So please help us spread the word to qualified candidates.

The availability of Firefox 3.1 beta 3 was just announced earlier today –if you’re reading this, I’m sure that’s not news to you. But one thing you may notice when you go grab the beta-3 build is a freshly revamped beta download page. Why refresh the “all-beta” page? A couple of reasons:

  • Active users — in a nutshell, we simply want more users on beta-3 to provide feedback, report issues and file bugs;
  • To get more active daily users, we need to reach more potential users. In my line of work that means raising awareness via the highly trafficked mozilla.com page, plus blog posts, our facebook page, twitter, and of course a little PR; (You heard about it, right?)
  • And to turn awareness into actual active users, we need a friendly download page that explains both the risks of using pre-release software without stifling the main objective: converting visitors to downloaders.

Just because it is beta software doesn’t mean the beta download page should make it challenging to download software. So with beta-3 release, we’ve tried to make it easier to find and download the latest, greatest Firefox by adding a big-honking orange download button to the beta page (Not to be confused with the big-honking green download button on the download page for our current shipping version, Firefox 3.07.)

So there you have it. Hope you like it. Thanks to all the folks who helped make this little project come together quickly. You’re certainly welcome to share your comments/feedback on the page here; but better yet — go download Firefox 3.1 beta 3 and help us build an even better product. After all, the goal here to get more beta testers. Thanks!

Since I posted an open call for visual designers and data engineers to help build some eye candy on top of Les Orchard’s LizardFeeder, there has been a flurry of interest and activity via the bug, and a few notably interesting posts. For example:

To date I’ve had several inquiries (which is great), a few suggestions and thoughts via both email, and am hopeful a few more concepts are in the works between now and this Friday’s deadline (2/20/09). I plan to circle back with Slater and Les, the creator of the LizardFeeder, next week to discuss options and next steps. In the meantime, “thank you” for giving us lots to think about and consider — really good stuff. And if you’ve got thoughts / feedback / ideas, please keep it coming.

Inspired in part by the “Light of Firefox,” a visualization of Firefox 3 downloads created by Dr. Yasuaki Kakehi and his team from Keio University, a small community project was born a few months ago.

The initial seed of this idea was to create a way to show appreciation to our many contributors to Firefox and the Mozilla community at large. The project’s objective: build a visually engaging representation of the activity that takes place throughout the Mozilla community every day.

Visualization projects, we’ve since learned, can be deeply complex. Thanks to some early help from Stamen Design, an SF-based firm specializing in data visualization, and the Mozilla web development team–who lent focus, scope and development expertise–the ball really got rolling in the last few months.

Here’s how it came together. Mike Morgan pulled together a list of different data feeds representing everything from Bugzilla activity to blog posts on Planet, code check-ins to wiki updates, and a few more for good measure. Then, Les Orchard hacked away to develop the LizardFeeder. The designers from Stamen hatched the concept of parsing authors from entries and activity as a way to begin to visualize the relationship between people and tasks. (More on that soon over on John Slater’s blog).

After this initial prototyping, we wanted to open up the project for creative inspiration from the talented designers who are part of the broader Mozilla community. We aim to create a compelling visual metaphor that effectively depicts the dynamic nature and breadth of activity happening right now across planet Mozilla.

So here we are. I just posted about this project on the Mozilla blog If you or someone you know someone wants to get involved, please let them know their creative energy is welcomed! Get involved here or by sending me mail: dbottoms at Mozilla dot com.

Firefox in your Country

To counter-balance the US-centric segmentation project with a global perspective, we launched a mini-series of “Firefox in your Country” surveys. Here we simply asked people in local communities to share the survey link with their family and friends in order to better understanding the drivers and barriers of Firefox adoption in each market.

While we knew this tact was hardly pure science, it was a fairly quick-and-dirty way to hear directly from people on the ground. And we learned A LOT! So much so, Alix recently did a second round of the survey in 15 languages to solicit feedback from even more markets. This survey just closed so i’m sure results will be shared in the new year.

Thanks to Alix for driving this project and chronicling the results, as well as to everyone out there who helped spread the word and shared your thoughts.

Understanding the other 80%

User insights are an essential part of creating successful marketing programs that hit the mark.  As a result of a recently concluded research project, I believe we are well positioned heading into 2009 with a better understanding of who our users are – and aren’t– and what we can do to continue to grow the base in the new year.

Getting to this point began with a simple question: if Firefox has 20% worldwide market share, what about the other 80%?
•    Who are they? How are they different than our current, loyal user base?
•    Why haven’t they downloaded Firefox yet (or have they)?
•    Have they even heard of Firefox – if so, what do they think about it?
•    What types of activities and tasks do they perform online?
•    Where and how might we connect with them to introduce Firefox?

To get at these questions and more, we recently conducted an Internet market segmentation study. By better understanding the Firefox user base within the broader context of the overall Internet user population, we hope to discover what makes the “other 80%” different from Firefox users. And in doing so, formulate some new ideas for continued growth.

Background [if methodology makes you yawn, skip down to Key Learnings]
The objective of any segmentation research project is to identify distinct sub-groups that exhibit different behaviors, attitudes and perceptions than other segments. In the case of the web browser market, we essentially wanted to take a snapshot of the entire Internet population at a moment in time to see what segments exist and what we could learn from them.

Unfortunately, it is not possible to do segmentation on a global scale – the estimated 1.4 billion Internet users worldwide do not lend themselves to a research methodology at that scale. Even in large markets like the United States, the total market size presents a challenge without doing some degree of sampling. If you know anything about how long it takes the government to collect census data, you’ll appreciate that we took a few shortcuts.

The first was to limit scope to the US. No slight to any other region intended – in many non-US markets Firefox share is much higher – but the objective was to execute this phase of the research without introducing the complexity and cost to replicate on a global scale. We worked with comScore, a well-known market research vendor with a consumer online “panel” of one million users in the US, large enough to serve as a representative sample of the market.

A few bits to note:
•    panel data is a sample; just like all the political polls leading up to election day, there is a +/- margin or error to consider;
•    the comScore panel is opt-in – consenting participants are aware their online behavior is being tracked for research purposes;
•    the panel is made up of Windows PC users only – the Mac and Linux population is accounted for as an overall % of population but their actual online behavior is not captured;
•    for more about comScore’s panel, visit comScore methodology.

The decision to use a 3rd party panel like comScore was driven by practicality and timeliness – their primary business is collecting behavioral data, normalizing and extrapolating it to represent the online activity of the broader population. For this project, comScore created a US segmentation matrix that crosses US Firefox users against all US browser users. The distinct segments are categorized by time spent (total minutes) as a proxy for browser usage intensity and engagement. The cells are defined as:
•    Super-Heavy = top 5% of users
•    Heavy = next 15% of users
•    Heavy-Moderate = next 15% users
•    Light-Moderate = next 15% of users
•    Light = bottom 50%

The resulting matrix is a way to cluster “like” groups together to better understand their population size, online usage patterns and most importantly what sets them apart from other segments. The first phase of the process began in September looking at July 2008, the first full month of data following the release of Firefox 3.0 in mid-June. The second phase concluded with an in-depth survey of the three primary segments identified.

Whew — that’s a lot to say, but it’s important. What follows are some of the highlights that might be most interesting to the Mozilla community. Some findings are consistent with data we’ve collected from other sources, such as NetApplications, while other insights are new and need to be further vetted and scrutinized. But the overarching point is that even directional insights are better than none at all (so the theory goes).  So without further delay, here’s a bit of what we learned.

Key Learnings, Part 1
For the month of July 2008, there were approximately 29.3 Million US Firefox users representing roughly 16% of the total US Internet population. For the month, comScore estimated the total US population at 189 Million, which is notably higher than Nielsen Netratings July total of 165 Million, but largely in line with eMarketer’s comparative roll-up of 193 Million users.

Interestingly, this estimate of total unique users translates into a disproportionately higher percentage of monthly browser usage:
•    24% of total Page Views on Firefox (avg. of 3,650 PVs p/user)
•    22% of total Minutes on Firefox (avg. 2,283 minutes p/user)

Given that we typically think of Firefox users as more tech-savvy and online intensive, it is not such a stretch to believe that both engagement metrics – Page Views and Time Spent – are above 20% and thus, in line with US market share as measured by NetApplications. What gets somewhat more interesting is the break down of total population into discreet segments.

Usage Segments
At first glance, the segmentation matrix (chart #1 below), looks like a 5 x 6 patchwork quilt. The horizontal axis represents the total Internet population, while the vertical axis represents US Firefox audience. Below the line is that “other 80%” of the US Internet base with no Firefox usage in the monthly snapshot.

comScore US Internet Segmentation matrix, July 2008

comScore US Internet Segmentation matrix, July 2008

For each cell in the matrix, we collected the following data:
•    Total unique users (UUs)
•    Avg. Usage days
•    Avg. Page Views
•    Avg. Minutes
•    Avg. Browser sessions

The color-coding shows how we’ve clustered similar segment cells based on browser type (Firefox vs. non-Firefox) and usage intensity (online minutes). Then, we named the discrete segments for the strategy that might be employed with that particular segment. Here’s how:
•    Green = Retention segment using Firefox for majority of online minutes;
•    Blue = Engagement segment uses Firefox but not for majority of minutes;
•    Orange = Acquisition segment with no Firefox usage in a given month;
•    Gray = Light segment, the bottom half with low monthly online usage;
•    Primary groups = the heaviest online users in terms of usage intensity;
•    Secondary groups = exhibits some of the same characteristics as the primary segments, but less online intensive (fewer minutes + page views per month).

While there’s clearly a lot of data to digest, this chart doesn’t show the relative size of each or usage intensity of each segment. To put that into context, we created a visual representation of the segmentation matrix to show each segment’s size as a % of the total (#2, top) and online usage intensity in % of total minutes (#3, bottom).

US Internet segments, source = comScore July 2008

US Internet segments, source = comScore July 2008

US Internet Usage % Minutes, source = comScore July 2008

US Internet Usage % Minutes, source = comScore July 2008

Some Highlights and Interesting Takeaways:
•    The top 20% of heavy US Internet users make up 69% of online time spent.
•    75% of heavy users are NOT using Firefox [Primary Acquisition segment].
•    Primary acquisition segment is approx. as large as the Firefox base (29 Million unique users), but has a different profile. (More on that later). Also, note this heavy user segment is 15% of the population that represents over half of the usage– wow!
•    Primary engagement segment (4.1M unique users) are dual browser users who use Firefox but spent the majority of their online time using IE.
•    Of Firefox users, nearly one-third are heavy Internet users and represent 78% of the total time spent on Firefox.
•    The primary retention segment (approx 4.9 Million unique users) or 3% of the total US Internet population drove 10% of the total online minutes.
•    Current Firefox users range from light to heavy Internet users, while about half are light Internet users.

Remember, the objective of this segmentation project is to help us think about how to action insights to better inform our marketing. Rather than boil the ocean and develop a set of strategies for each group, we decided to focus on the three primary segments (right side of the chart in the red box) that collectively represent the top 20% of US Internet users.

In my next post, I’ll get into more detail about each of these primary segments. Meanwhile, I would welcome your thoughts and ideas about things the marketing team should consider to either help acquire new users, engage those secondary Firefox users, or retain our most loyal users.

Market Insights, part 1

In my last post, I covered a bit about the role of marketing, highlighting the balance between art (creative output) and science (data insights). In this post, I want to delve a little deeper into the kinds of data that can make us smarter about our current audience and opportunities to grow share among users who’ve yet to move to Firefox.

At the highest level, virtually anyone who uses the Internet at home, work, school, in an Internet cafe or on a mobile device is a potential Firefox user. While some marketers may be accused of overstating the viability of a sizable market — like say, a beverage maker who cites “anyone with thirst” as a potentially huge target market — in this case, if you use the Internet, you probably really do need a web browser.

Thus, huge markets beget opportunity. In fact, according to Internet World stats, the worldwide market is closing in on 1.5 Billion Internet users (last updated in June 2008). Wow…When you stop to really think about that, it can be somewhat paralyzing to know that there are that many people out in the world who have a fundamental need for your product. So how do you even begin to think about who the target audience is?

The answer starts with data. First, let’s break it down by region.

World Internet users by Region

Source = http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm

Worth noting here:

  • The combination of North America, Europe and Asia make up 83% of the WW Internet population.
  • Asia represents the single largest share of users — and this is just the tip of the iceberg.

Now let’s look at Internet World stats’ penetration data — the percentage of the total population with Internet access.

//www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm

source = http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm

Interesting, but what’s the takeaway?

  • In terms of overall Internet penetration, North America (74%) and Europe (50%) are much more mature regions than Asia, which still hovers around 15% penetration. There are obviously a variety of factors at play, but without question Asia has loads of growth potential (not surprising given all the attention paid to China and India over the past few years).
  • What is somewhat surprising in looking at the charts above is that Latin America, which represents just under 10% of the world’s user base, actually has higher Internet penetration today (24%), as well as a faster growth rate than Asia over the last several years (+669%).

Ultimately this begs a question of focus — if we lack the resources to promote Firefox everywhere in 2009, why not place some educated bets? Should we bet on where the market is today (Europe and North America) or where it is emerging tomorrow (Asia and Latin America)?  To get a clearer picture, let’s break this down further between mature and emerging markets.

Here I’ve created a simple chart that combines the % penetration and % growth from Internet World stats with NetApplications most recent browser marketshare data. Then, I’ve categorized into general buckets for an at-a-glance comparison among countries. The rough buckets are as follows:

  • Penetration % – under 20% = Low; from 20-50% = Moderate; over 50% = High
  • Growth  %- under 150% = Low; from 150-400% = Moderate; over 400% = High
  • Firefox Share %- under 15% = Low; from 15-20% = Moderate; over 20% = High

Here’s a look at the mature markets — those with greater than 50% Internet penetration:

Internet World stats, Netapplications, oct 2008

Source: Internet World stats, Netapplications, oct 2008

As you can see:

  • The US is by far the largest of the mature markets in terms of raw Internet population (220M*).
  • The US, Japan and Germany are “High” in terms of % penetration but “Low” in terms of growth rate over the period 2000-2008.
  • Firefox share ranges from “High” in Germany (38%) to “Moderate” in the US (18.5%) to and “Low” in Japan (14.5%).

While much could be made of each of these data points, for now let’s just compare to the “emerging markets” — those with below 50% Internet penetration:

Source = Internet World stats, NetApplications

Source = Internet World stats, NetApplications

  • All of the markets above are in the “High” growth bucket, several +1000% over the last 8 years, thus signaling continued opportunity to make inroads over time.
  • In terms of raw size, China not only dwarfs the other emerging markets, but also bests the US in total Internet population today. Important to note that this is with just 19% penetration vs. 72.5% in the US.
  • But perhaps most interesting and notable is the range of Firefox share by market — from the lowest in China (5.6%) to highs in Indonesia (55%) and Poland (47%).

Looking at this kind of data can help get our arms around potential opportunity areas. Of the mature markets, the US has to remain a strategic focal point given raw size and high penetration today. Germany and France remain are among the strongest footholds in mature markets of significant size, while the UK and Italy could use a boost.

Of the emerging markets, we obviously can’t ignore China, and have begun to take some marketing action in Brazil and consider future activities in India and Russia. But beyond the BRIC nations, who’s next? Mexico, Argentina? Vietnam? Poland? All of the Above?

While we can certainly build on and continue to grow our active communities in all of the markets above, we’re also looking for markets where specific marketing activity–either via events or word-of-mouth evangelism — can ignite or at least accelerate the organic growth they are already experiencing. Where is Firefox spreading totally organically (Indonesia?) or poised to top 50% because of an active community (Poland?). If we hone in on only the markets with greatest potential, are they large enough to swing overall WW market share points or are we better off battling for another 3-4 points in the UK?

These are all the insight-driven kinds of questions that help us think about concrete marketing strategies to grow Firefox market share in 2009. Once you can boil down the 1.5 Billion users in the WW market, we can begin to understand where we have real traction and where we lack it. We can also start to better understand the unique dynamics of those markets, what we know about our users there — and what we need to know about the “other 80%” of users not currently using Firefox.

In the coming days and weeks, Alix will be sharing some interesting survey data conducted in a few high-growth markets to better understand awareness and Firefox adoption trends. And I’ll be posting more about some in-depth market research conducted in the US to better understand our core user base and where we might expand to reach new consumer audiences. IMHO, surfacing data-driven insights can only help to inform and inspire our marketing efforts in 2009 and beyond.

* [Note: 220M US Internet users is significantly larger than sources like Comscore tracking "active" Internet users at 190M in Sept 08, but for purposes of comparison, I've used InternetWorld stats here].

The Marketing Conversation

This post will be the first in a series about what I’ve been up to since joining Mozilla just after Download Day. Lots has happened since then– and my intent is to get better about more frequent posts. Now that I’ve worked through a quarter’s worth of projects, I’ve gotten to know the team, their areas of expertise and a bit more about how things work around here. (David, John, Alix, Jay and Tara did a great session on open source marketing, at the Summit btw). But before I get into marketing at Mozilla, I want to discuss a few thoughts on marketing in general.

So what is “marketing anyway? It’s a relevant discussion starter because the role can vary widely from place to place, even within the same vertical industry (consider Google vs. Yahoo!). The role and tactics can also vary depending on the stage of the product life cycle or breadth of offering (think start-up vs. Fortune 100 enterprise). Marketing strategies demand a fairly fluid set of activities that should change from quarter to quarter, year over year. And the function should evolve to reflect both the maturing of products and services, as well as the audiences and potential use cases.

I generally think about marketing as the functional fusion of art and science.  There’s the creative, consumer-facing stuff people often associate with marketing -– logos, taglines, t-shirts, trade shows, and in some instances, advertising. Then there’s the science – the quantitative market research and analysis used to identify who we are talking to or should be trying to reach. This includes insights into the core user base, what they expect from the products that matter most, and how to effectively connect with them across different channels and touchpoints.

It’s the combination of the art and science that generally leads to the best “marketing.” If the objective is to deliver the right message via the right channel to the right user at the right time, the end result should be prompting some desired action (like switching to Firefox). But if you think I’m talking about advertising, think again. Mozilla is unique in that our “right” message about why to try Firefox is much more often delivered first hand by our current users via word-of-mouth conversations than by our own web site, a Google search, a press article, or an ad.

In fact, Laura Mesa just posted some of the initial results of our first quarterly customer satisfaction survey, where 55% of users responded they heard about Firefox 3 from a friend’s recommendation. Moreover, when asked to rate their likelihood to recommend Firefox – arguably the simplest but most telling metric for how satisfied users are with a product – the top-2 combination (adding the 4s and 5s) totaled 89%. When you factor out the negative ratings, you still wind up with a baseline  Net Promoter score of 86.

Granted, this survey may reflect own most engaged users, the ones who actually took the time to take a simple survey. But still, this is really, really powerful stuff. Especially in the digital era when people are constantly bombarded with intrusive ads instead of contextual conversations that people can participate in. One of my favorite descriptions of the role of marketing is from Doc Searls in the preface to “The Cluetrain Manifesto.” He writes:

…my brief philosophy of marketing:
•    Markets are conversations; and
•    Conversation is fire. Therefore,
•    Marketing is arson.

I just love that. Our job as marketers is less about launching campaigns and more about starting conversations that can impact markets. In a nutshell, we should all be thinking about how can we make our product more worthy of conversation? Seth Godin has a beautiful description of making marketing remarkable in his book called Purple Cow. This philosophy tends to play out on the creative side, but equally important is where and with whom those conversations need to happen in order to grow our share of mind and market.

Which brings me back to the blend of art and science. As armchair pop culture critics can attest, the “marketing department” often gets the called out for misguided attempts to position and promote products to audiences that have little interest, desire or incentive to engage in the conversation. (Anyone read about the Seinfeld campaign for Windows?). Often times it is less about bad creative (the art part) and more about limited insights (the science part). Marketers who have a better handle on the science–who the target is and the attitudes they exhibit–have a much better chance at delivering on really compelling art.

So when I started at Mozilla back in June I went through a simple planning exercise that entailed asking questions, identifying gaps in understanding the marketplace, and assessing what we’ve been doing to move the needle. I’m pleased to say we’re doing pretty darn well by a number of performance measures, but I’ll save this discussion for another post.  For now I’ll leave this one with an open call to keep participating in the marketing of Firefox – visit SpreadFirefox.com and start a conversation.

I’m pleased to see a new survey has come online in the past few days — Jane from the UK just wrote a nice post about it. She writes:

Over the next few weeks we’ll be running 6 surveys, in 6 different languages – they are now online and fully available in English, Spanish, Polish, German, Brazilian Portuguese and Indonesian. And, just to let you know, we are keen to replicate the survey in other languages, so we’ll be working on next steps for this in the coming weeks.

The survey is posted here. The objective here is to learn first hand from both the local Firefox community and their extended circles of family, friends, and co-workers about why Firefox is spreading in their respective markets, and what might be drivers–or barriers–to further trial and adoption. In addition to being of interest to local community leaders, we’re hopeful to gain some insights that might be transferrable to other markets as well.

Older Posts »